Optimizing Design and Controls for Thermal Energy Storage
Model Comparisons
FDM Parametric Optimal
FDM Parametric Optimal
35
40
45
50
50
30
ထွက်
30
5
50
Optimal Energy Density (kWh/m³)
30
30
35
40
Error Lines ± 5%
AAD: 1.6672
45
PPFA Analytical Model Optimal
FDM Parametric Optimal
Optimal Thickness ( cm )
Optimal Porosity (%)
20
100
16
12
00
4
50
0
4
FDM Parametric Optimal
95
90
85
Error Lines ± 1 cm
AAD: 0.85782
80
16
20
80
85
8
12
PPFA Analytical Model Optimal
Optimal Energy Density (kWh/m³)
Optimal Thickness ( cm )
20
35
Error Lines ± 5%
AAD: 0.47811
40
45
Lumped Mass Approximation Optimal
FDM Parametric Optimal
16
12
FDM Parametric Optimal
Error Lines ±2.5% porosity
AAD: 0.71524
90
95
100
PPFA Analytical Model Optimal
Optimal Porosity (%)
100
95
90
00
подобос
4
85
Error Lines ± 1 cm
AAD: 0.49879
Error Lines ± 2.5% porosity
AAD: 1.925
0
50
0
8
4
12
16
Lumped Mass Approximation Optimal
80
20
80
85
90
Lumped Mass Approximation Optimal
95
100
James et al., 2022View entire presentation