Climate Change Impact and Structural Reforms in Kiribati slide image

Climate Change Impact and Structural Reforms in Kiribati

KIRIBATI (Foley et al., 2010). A proper MSP can help to increase the stability, transparency, and predictability of the investment climate and reduce the riskiness of investment in ocean-based businesses (the so-called blue economy). In 2021, over 45 countries worldwide are either implementing or approving marine spatial plans-and dozens more are laying the foundation-following guidance set out by the Unesco-European Commision's MSPglobal (2021) initiative. However, as MSPs have broader objectives besides fishery management, which creates more complexity in delivering a blue economy. Key challenges include ecosystem threats (e.g., pollution, marine litter, climate change, habitat destruction, invasive species, etc.), governance issues (lack of resources, lack of sectoral or transboundary collaboration, and lack of governance integration) and sectoral issues (fisheries-overexploitation and illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing, seabed mining/spatial use conflicts, and the environmental impacts of tourism, maritime transport and offshore renewable energy). In addition, this may open a broader debate about diversification and reducing the weight of fisheries in the economy to make it more sustainable, while replacing low value-added subsectors in fisheries with high value-added ones (see the Selected Issues Paper on Unlocking Growth Potential in Kiribati: Taking Stock of Structural Reforms). D. The PIPA - Kiribati's Marine Protected Area 17. In 2015, the PIPA was declared a marine protected area. PIPA was officially created in 2008 and fully banned commercial fishing in 2015. The Phoenix Islands area spans more than 400,000 square kilometers (about the size of California). It is one of the world's largest marine protected areas and serves as a spawning ground for tuna and other fish (Hernandez et al., 2019), a refuge for migratory birds and for rare coral reef formations. At the time, Kiribati was praised ³ for its marine conservation efforts as a low-income developing country and served as a role model to address problems of overfishing and mitigate climate change, by contributing to the 30-by-30 goal (achieving 30 percent of oceans as marine-protected area by 2030) and as one of 41 signatories to the "Because the Ocean Initiative" in 2015. 18. In November 2021, the Kiribati Cabinet decided to re-open the PIPA to commercial fishing. As a result, the site may also have to be de-registered from UNESCO's World Heritage List. The official reason behind the move is to generate more revenues from tuna fishing in the marine reserve. Doing so would allow Kiribati to more fully utilize its natural resources while remaining committed to conservation, albeit in a very different form. 19. The authorities estimated that the closure of PIPA resulted in significant foregone fishing revenues. Fishing revenues account for about 70 percent of total fiscal revenues in Kiribati in 2021, averaging about AUD185 million during 2015-2020 (about 70 percent of GDP). As the PIPA accounts for about 11 percent of Kiribati's EEZs, the government estimated that the closure of PIPA led to a decline of fishing demand by 8 percent between 2015 and 2021 (720 fishing days), which also affected its future allocation of VDS days. In addition, there is recognition in the literature that 8 Kiribati's domestic marine conservation initiative was recognized by the United Nations General Assembly as an exemplary model of international cooperation, coordination, and collaboration in marine protection and conservation in 2018. 50 INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND
View entire presentation