Nutrition Supplement Distribution Analysis

Summary Points • Cost and cost-effectiveness analysis provides information needed in the selection of supplementary foods. • • Cost-Effectiveness Results for stunting and wasting are similar: - CSB+ with oil was most cost-effective - RUSF was the most expensive from the program perspective; SC+ was most expensive from the program & caregiver perspective - CSWB had the second lowest cost, but also lower effectiveness Valuing caregiver time affects relative rankings of cost-effectiveness, but not conclusion that CSB+/oil was most cost-effective in this study. 77

View entire presentation