Investor Presentaiton slide image

Investor Presentaiton

ASCEND Program-Level Cardiovascular Safety Data MACE profile was generally consistent across treatment groups in all trials* Patients with events n/N (%) Rate per 100 PY (95% CI) Favors Daprodustat Favors ESA MACE Daprodustat ESA+ Daprodustat ESA+ ASCEND-ND 378/1937 (19.5) 374/1487 371/1935 (19.2) 394/1477 10.86 (9.80, 12.02) 10.63 H Absolute rate difference per 100 PY (95% CI) 0.23 (-1.31, 1.77) (9.58, 11.77) 11.07 11.86 ASCEND-D -0.78 (-2.41, 0.84) HH (25.2) (26.7) (9.98, 12.26) (10.72, 13.09) 19/157 15/155 ASCEND-ID (12.1) (9.7) 33/270 14/137 ASCEND-TD (12.2) (10.2) 11.65 (7.02, 18.20) 12.30 (8.46, 17.27) 9.24 (5.17, 15.24) 2.41 (-4.61, 9.43) 10.02 (5.48, 16.81) 2.28 (-4.44, 9.00) 0 5 10 15 20 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 Rate per 100 PY (95% CI) Absolute rate difference per 100 PY (95% CI) First MACE rates in ASCEND-NHQ (28 weeks): 4.9% daprodustat; 6.2% placebo *Smaller trials (ASCEND-ID, ASCEND-TD and ASCEND-NHQ) reported MACE but were not designed for formal MACE evaluation; †Darbepoetin alfa (ASCEND-D, -ND, -ID), epoetin alfa (ASCEND-D, -TD). 17
View entire presentation