ANNUAL INTEGRATED REPORT 2021
ANNUAL INTEGRATED REPORT 2021 | AXTEL
=
the changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument with the
changes in the fair value of the hypothetical derivative that would
result in a perfect coverage of the covered item.
According to the amount described and the way in which the
derivative cash flows are exchanged, for this hedging strategy, the
average hedge ratio is 51%, 73% and 93%, in 2021, 2020 and 2019,
respectively. In this hedge relationship, the source of ineffectiveness
is mainly credit risk.
b. Forwards of accounting hedge with the objective of covering the
exposure to the USD/MXN exchange rate variability.
Because the Company has the Mexican peso (MXN) as the functional
currency and maintains obligations in USD, it is exposed to foreign
exchange risk. Therefore, in December 2019, it designated forward
contracts as accounting hedges, where the hedged item is represented
by obligations in USD and by the exchange fluctuation of the bond; the
conditions of the derivative financial instruments and the considerations
of their valuation as hedging instruments are mentioned below:
Characteristics
Currency
Total notional
2019
USD
US$15,900
19.6560
MXN/USD
May 12, 2020
$(6,535)
Average strike
Maturity
Forward's book value
Change in the fair value of the forwards to measure
ineffectiveness
$(6,535)
Reclassification from OCI to income
$4,043
Balance recognized in OCI net of reclassifications
$2,492
Ineffectiveness recognized in income
Change in the fair value of the hedged item to measure
$6,535
ineffectiveness
Change in the fair value FDI vs 2018
$32,723
In measuring the effectiveness of these hedges, the Company
determined that they are highly effective because the changes
in the fair value and cash flows of each hedged item are offset
within the range of effectiveness established by management. The
prospective effectiveness test for the USD/MXN exchange rate
ratio resulted in 100% for 2019, confirming that there is an economic
relationship between the hedging instruments and the instruments
hedged. In addition, both the credit profile of the Company and
the counterparty are good and are not expected to change in the
medium term; therefore, the credit risk component is not considered
to dominate the hedging relationship. The method that was used
to evaluate the effectiveness is through a qualitative evaluation
comparing the critical terms between the hedging instrument and
the hedged instrument.
According to the notional amounts described and the way in which
the flows of the derivatives are exchanged, the average hedging
ratio for the USD/MXN exchange rate is 100% for 2019. If necessary,
a rebalancing will be performed to maintain this relationship for the
strategy.
The source of ineffectiveness can be mainly caused by the
difference in the settlement date of the hedging instruments and
the hedged items, and that the budget becomes less than the
hedging instruments. For the year ended December 31, 2019, no
ineffectiveness was recognized in gain or loss.
As of December 31, 2020, a gain of $63,990 was recognized in
the consolidated statement of income for the settlement of said
hedging instrument.
141
111View entire presentation