Investor Presentaiton
ideologically driven to write a memoir inconsistent with his beliefs, and thus this source, in its
biases, stands as a testament to his ideological fervor, perhaps the most prominent aspect of his
entire character.
Underlying the memoir is the continuous theme of Kaganovich's desire to be readmitted
to the Party. The second primary source I rely on also carries this theme. Thus Spoke
Kaganovich, written by Felix Chuev, is a compilation of meetings and conversations between
Chuev and Kaganovich that occurred over a period of roughly five years in the mid-1980s. 14 This
book is much shorter than Kaganovich's memoir but nevertheless contains fascinating and vital
insights into his life and thoughts. Like the memoir, Thus Spoke Kaganovich begins with a
declaration of ideological purity and a call for the victory of Communism over the post-Stalinist
era relaxations of Party control and ideological fervor. Additionally, the content of this work is in
many ways more open and relaxed than the memoir.
Finally, the third main primary source I use is the collection of letters between Stalin and
Kaganovich from 1931-1936. Beginning in 1931, these letters were written when Stalin was not
in Moscow and Kaganovich was left in charge of the Politburo in his absence. The 177 letters
included in the volume range in topic from shorter, more personal communications to longer
pieces about the major issues plaguing the country and potential solutions. These letters are very
insightful into the pressing issues that occurred between 1931-1936, primarily agriculture
production issues and overseeing collectivization. The letters also portray Stalin and Kaganovich
as leaders and individuals and highlight some of their opinions on other figures within the Party.
The combination of these three primary sources, with Kaganovich's memoir playing the
14 Feliks, Chuev, Tak govoril Kaganovich: ispoved' stalinskogo apostola, (Moskva: "Otechestvo;" [S.1.]: Distributed
by East View Publications, 1992).
7View entire presentation