Assessing Climate Change Risk and Resilience in the Yukon slide image

Assessing Climate Change Risk and Resilience in the Yukon

to increase given the pace of climate change impacts, and the persisting gaps in information. Experts who work on environmental health noted that there are significant gaps in managing invasive species and their impacts on biodiversity. Building capacity for prevention, early detection, rapid response and management is needed. 7 Through Our Clean Future, work on parks and protected areas and the Yukon Parks Strategy, programming related to fish and wildlife, and the implementation of Yukon First Nations Final Agreements, the Inuvialuit Final Agreement, and Gwich'in Comprehensive Land Claim Agreement, the Government of Yukon is monitoring the health of certain species to indicate climate change impacts on ecosystems, assessing the health status of wetland ecosystems, tracking new and invasive species, monitoring climate change impacts in parks and protected areas, and working with Indigenous governments and organizations on protected area management, monitoring, and stewardship. Yukon's protected area network is not yet complete. For example, the Parks and Land Certainty Act commits the Government of Yukon to have one core protected park within each ecoregion. This has not yet been achieved. ā€• and the Joint management initiatives among federal, territorial and Indigenous governments implementation of Yukon First Nations Final Agreements, the Inuvialuit Final Agreement, and the Yukon Transboundary Agreement of the Gwich'in Comprehensive Land Claim Agreement - are identifying priorities for conservation, management and stewardship. The implementation of co-management and joint management agreements over lands and waters can build meaningful relationships, advance reconciliation, and build capacity to adapt to climate change impacts. Additionally, land guardian programs can support and/or facilitate community-based monitoring and can help fill gaps in information and build capacity to adapt to changes to plants and animals. 7. Participants explained that in the Yukon, there is no single government department that has a mandate to manage or respond to impacts of biodiversity outside specific sectors or areas (such as parks). Plants, fungi and invertebrates are examples. The Department of Environment manages wildlife (vertebrate animals) and their habitat, which is harvest focused. Fungi and plants fall under the responsibility of the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, but they are considered in the context of forestry and agriculture. This leads to a gap in managing many invasive species and their effects on biodiversity more broadly. CHAPTER 4 PRIORITIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS PAGE 23
View entire presentation