Investor Presentaiton slide image

Investor Presentaiton

Iron Blow and Mt Bonnie VMS deposits Table 3: Total Hayes Creek Mineral Resources (Iron Blow + Mt Bonnie) by JORC Classification as at 03 May 2017 JORC Classification Tonnage (kt) Cu Zn (%) Pb (%) Ag (g/t) Au (g/t) ZnEq AuEq (g/t) (%) (%) Total Indicated (84.7%) 3,455 4.88 1.01 0.27 137 1.88 11.99 9.29 Total Inferred (15.3%) 622 1.39 0.37 0.10 52 1.46 5.03 3.91 Total Indicated + Inferred Mineral 4,077 4.35 0.91 0.25 124 1.81 10.93 8.47 Resource Total Contained Metal (t) 177,200 37,000 10,050 16.2Moz 237.7koz 445,000t 1,110koz Notes relating to Tables 1, 2 & 3 Due to effects of rounding, the total may not represent the sum of all components. Metallurgical recoveries and metal prices have been applied in calculating zinc equivalent (ZnEq) and gold equivalent (AuEq) grades. Iron Blow - A mineralisation envelope was interpreted for each of the two main lodes, the East Lode (Zn-Au-Ag-Pb) and West Lode (Zn-Au), and four subsidiary lodes with a 1 g/t AuEq cut-off used to interpret and report these lodes. Mt Bonnie - Zinc domains are reported above a cut-of grade of 1% Zn, gold domains are reported above a cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au and silver domains are reported above a cut-off grade of 50 g/t Ag. In order to assess the potential value of the total suite of minerals of economic interest, formulae were developed to calculate metal equivalency for the gold and zinc (see below). Metal prices were derived from average consensus forecasts from external sources for the period 2017 through 2021 and are consistent with those used in PNX's recently updated Mt Bonnie Mineral Resource Estimate. Metallurgical recovery information was sourced from test work completed at the Iron Blow deposit, including historical test work. Mt Bonnie and Iron Blow have similar mineralogical characteristics and are a similar style of deposit. In PNX's opinion all the metals used in the equivalence calculation have a reasonable potential to be recovered and sold. PNX has chosen to report both the ZnEq and AuEq grades as although individually zinc is the dominant metal by value, the precious metals are the dominant group by value and will be recovered and sold separately to the zinc. The formulae below were applied to the estimated constituents to derive the metal equivalent values: Gold Equivalent (field = "AuEq") (g/t) = (Au grade (g/t) * (Au price per ounce/31.10348) * Au recovery) + (Ag grade (g/t) * (Ag price per ounce/31.10348) * Ag recovery) + (Cu grade (%) * (Cu price per tonne/100) * Cu recovery) + (Pb grade (%) * (Pb price per tonne/100) * Pb recovery) + (Zn grade (%) * (Zn price per tonne/100) * Zn recovery) / (Au price per ounce/31.10348 * Au recovery) Zinc Equivalent (field = "ZnEq") (%) = (Au grade (g/t) * (Au price per ounce/31.10348) * Au recovery) + (Ag grade (g/t) * (Ag price per ounce/31.10348) * Ag recovery) + (Cu grade (%) (Cu price per tonne/100) * Cu recovery) + (Pb grade (%) * (Pb price per tonne/100) * Pb recovery) + (Zn grade (%) * (Zn price per tonne/100) * Zn recovery) / (Zn price per tonne/100 Zn recovery) Metals Unit Price Recovery Mt Bonnie Recovery Iron Blow Zn USD/t 2,450 80% 80% Pb USD/t 2,100 60% 60% Cu USD/t 6,200 60% 60% Ag USD/troy ounce 20.50 70% 80% Au USD/troy ounce 1,350 55% 60% PNZ METALS 33
View entire presentation