Investor Presentaiton

2 achieve, giving EPA multi-billion-dollar power through overbroad readings of a few select words. And fourth, it raises serious constitutional concerns because it permits EPA to exercise extraordinary lawmaking power with no intelligible standards to keep it in check. Ultimately, EPA's efforts were no ordinary regulatory action. And no matter "how serious the problem" at stake, an agency "may not exercise its authority in a manner that is inconsistent with the administrative structure that Congress enacted into law." FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 125 (2000) (cleaned up). The Court should reverse. OPINION BELOW The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (JA.53-255) is reported at 985 F.3d 914. JURISDICTION The D.C. Circuit entered judgment on January 19, 2021. The petition for certiorari was timely filed on April 29, 2021. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1). STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED The Clean Air Act's relevant provisions appear at No. 20-1530 Pet.App.204a-209a. STATEMENT 1. The Clean Air Act targets air pollution "at the source." 42 U.S.C. § 7401(a)(3). Sources can be mobile, like cars, or stationary. Id. § 7602(z). A “stationary source” is "any building, structure, facility or installation

View entire presentation