Investor Presentaiton slide image

Investor Presentaiton

12. REDD+ in the State of Acte + Brazil + Ra dame REDD+ in the State of Acre - Brazil 13 Safeguarding social and environmental rights and promoting co-benefits To achieve its social and environmental goals, Acre's State Government is developing a safe- guards framework to consist-ently implement SISA in accordance with national and interna-tional sa- feguards, aiming at avoiding negative impacts for peo-ple and the environment as well as promoting co-benefits. Since 2010, Acre has been a pioneer in the REDD+ Social and Environmental Standards (REDD+ SES) Initiative. Following a multi-stakeholder process, Acre, in 2015, was the first juris-diction that develo- ped and applied REDD+ SES, in an effort to monitor safeguards implementation within SISA and align it with international REDD+ initiatives (full process documentation & reports are available here: http:// www.redd-standards.org/countries/latin-america/ state-of-acre-brazil). Furthermore, the State's sys- tem includes the following ele-ments:: • Several rights-based principles are contained in SISA State Law 2308, ensuring the respect and strengthening of cultural diversity, of the rights of Indigenous Peoples and traditional communities, sustainable resource use as well • • • as social justice and equity in ben-efit sharing. Grievance Mechanism: in 2014, an Ombudsman, related to the State Department of Environment and Attorney's office, was established with the objective to receive suggestions, complaints, de- nunciations as well as proposals of any individual or entity with regard to SISA. Moreover, the Om- budsman has the authority to mediate conflicts that may occur among SISA stakeholders. (Email address of the SI-SA Ombudsman: ouvidoria. [email protected]) Consultation and Participation: prior to the establishment of SISA, the proposed law was consulted broadly with civil society actors. With regard to SISA's design, implementation and monitoring, the governance structure ensures multi-stakeholder participation. Transparency is integrated in SISA's institutional structure, provid-ing roles and responsibilities of its different bodies (CDSA, IMC, CE-VA, FEF, ombudsman, scientific committee). Important decisions are made publicly available. As a REM requirement, financial audits are undertaken regularly. • Clarity on land rights: basic information on forest tenure is available for around 75% of the area. Gaps are being continuously addressed through existing efforts. Change Conference in Cancún (2010), seven sa- feguards were established, providing broad princi- ples for the implementation of REDD+ addressing transparency, stakeholder participation, protection of biodiversity and ecosystem services, respect of the rights of indigenous and local communities, leakage as well as other risks of environmental in- tegrity. Safeguards reporting: In 2015, Brazil was the first country to submit a Safeguards Summary to the UNFCCC detailing how the Cancún safeguards are being addressed and respected (http://redd. unfccc.int/files/brazil_safeguards_summary_fi- nal20150508.pdf). Updates will be submitted annually. Safeguards Information System (SIS): to further systematize the national safeguards reporting, Brazil is developing a Safeguards In-formation System, based on existing sys- tems and sources. In fu-ture, the Safeguards Summary will be generated from the infor-ma- tion contained in the SIS. From 2016 onwards, Acre's sub-national safe- guards processes and systems is being harmonized and linked up with the na-tional safeguards sys- tem. Managing risks and The partners agreed on a mechanism to manage risks and uncertainties: For each ton of rewarded emission reductions by REM, an additional ton is retired by the State of Acre, considered as Acre's own contribution to the partnership and a sign of political will towards reduced deforestation. This seeks to also address risks of shifting deforestation to areas outside of the accounting area ('leakage'); the reversal of emission reduc-tions ('non- permanence'); and uncertainties associated to the estimation of emission reductions, e.g. with respect to defor-estation data and emission factors.
View entire presentation