Australia Coal and Laos Power: Operational and Financial Summary
Fundamentals (iii): power business cont'd
CORE SKILLS
•
OVER TWO
DECADES OF
EXPERIENCE
BANPU
POWER
SOLID TRACK RECORD
Banpu: two decades of experience in Asian power
THAILAND
COCO
300 MW
1995
MORE THAN
$5.1 BN*
COMMITTED
2000
2.4 GW
PROJECT
ACROSS
2005
FINANCE
REGION
Japan***
BLCP
1.4
Laos 0.1 Thailand
2010
0.7
$5.1
0.7
2.4
Bn
Hongsa
GW
3.7
0.9
China
Coco phase III
(2000)
Figures are on
100% basis
Figures are on
equity basis
Demonstrated expertise and
experience in project finance,
project development
and operations
Dynamic leadership team for
'Banpu Power' with strong
credentials
*Investment costs
**Equity capacity of power and steam combined in
GW equivalent
***MW
AC
TECO
BLCP
HONGSA
LAOS INDONESIA CHINA
BONTANG LN.ZD.ZP Japan Solar
JAPAN
38%
815 MW
770 tph
Divested
700 MW
Divested
700 MW
50%
Coal fired (Banpu%)
Gas-fired (Banpu%)
2015
Others
•
•
75-100%
50%
14 MW
0
248 MW
798 tph
1,434 MW
40%
1.878 MW
90%
10 MW
+
COAL-POWER SYNERGIES
Phu Fai
Mining
Gaohe
HONGSA
POWER
22
14.3 Mtpa 1,878 MW
0.6 Mtpa
Shanxi
Lu Guang
3rd party
1,320 MW
2.6 Mtpa
BANPU
Two decades: pioneering
private sector power developer
in Asia 1993-2015
Diverse portfolio of power
assets by geography, stage of
development, revenue
dynamics, partners
•
.
.
Competitive advantages from
synergies with coal business for
mine-mouth and other coal-
fired power projects
both examples of integration
Hongsa and Gaohe - SLG are
Bontang* 14MW captive coal-
fired of ITM
*Bontang is a captive coal-fired power plant of ITM
and not part of Banpu Power's asset portfolio
10View entire presentation