Energy Storage Value and Adoption Analysis slide image

Energy Storage Value and Adoption Analysis

- - Evaluation of Key Value Drivers Reduction in Production Costs Findings We find APC savings of $4.5 to $16.5 million in 2020 (200 MW vs. 1,000 MW storage deployed), and $9.3 to $40.6 million in 2030. Savings due three factors: Reduced costs of operating NV generators Reduced imports during high priced hours Increased revenues from sales Savings account for the value of storage providing ancillary services Incremental savings (savings due to adding 1 additional MW of storage) fall as more storage is added and highest-value opportunities saturate 2020 Adjusted Production Cost Savings (in nominal $million/year) Savings (Storage Case minus Base Case) 1,000 MW Production Cost Base 200 MW 1,000 MW 200 MW Production Cost $421 $420 $423 ($1.1) $2.2 Cost of Market Purchases Revenues from Sales $132 $129 $124 ($3.1) ($7.9) ($46) ($46) ($57) ($0.4) ($10.8) $507 $502 $490 ($4.5) ($16.5) Total Estimated Incremental Benefit from APC Savings Incremental Benefit ($/kW-yr) Simulated $60 $50 Extrapolated from Simulation Results $40 2030 Incremental Benefit $30 2020 Incremental Benefit $20 $10 $0 200 400 600 800 1,000 Sources and Notes: Storage Deployed (MW) All values in nominal dollars. The total APC savings from simulations with 200 MW and 1,000 MW were used to estimate a relationship between storage deployed and total savings, from which we can estimate the relationship between storage deployed and incremental APC savings. brattle.com 15
View entire presentation