Investor Presentaiton slide image

Investor Presentaiton

Doses to the public The previous UNSCEAR report was based on data until October 2012, while the 2020 Report made use of new information from measurements made on people and in the environment to make more realistic and validated estimates of levels of exposure of the public. New data also enabled more realistic external exposure models to be used, quantitative assessments to be made of the uncertainties in the estimated levels of exposure and of the ranges of exposure levels in the population groups considered. An example of the results from the 2020 Report is shown in figures 1 and 2. This shows estimates of the average effective doses in the first year after the accident to infants in municipalities that were not evacuated and average annual doses in 2021. For perspective, the annual average dose in Japan from natural radiation is 2.2 mSv. The updated, more realistic estimates of doses to members of the public have generally either decreased or are broadly comparable with the Committee's previous estimates. The contribution of ingestion of food and water is much less than previously estimated, and the contribution of external exposure is larger. For those who were evacuated, the estimated average effective doses to infants in the first year for the different evacuation groups ranged from about 0.2 mSv to about 8 mSv. The evacuation of municipalities averted or significantly reduced the exposure of the affected population. High doses did not occur because of the evacuation (but also due to other non-human factors, mainly the wind blowing towards the ocean during the first two days of the accident). Doses have reduced since the accident. In 2021, the estimated average annual effective doses were less than 0.5 mSv in parts of Fukushima Prefecture that were not evacuated and below 0.1 mSv elsewhere in Japan. In the evacuated communities where evacuation orders have been lifted, estimated annual average effective doses in 2021, taking account of remediation work, were generally less than 1 mSv. In addition to the average doses to defined groups of members of the public, which were the focus of the Committee's previous report, the Committee has also estimated the ranges of doses to individuals in the population groups, taking account of 38°N 37°N 38°N 37°N NIIGATA GUNMA SAITAMA NIIGATA GUNMA SAITAMA TOCHIGI TOCHIGI 140°E 140°E YAMAGATA MIYAGI 141°E O FDNPS FUKUSHIMA IBARAKI Figure 1 YAMAGATA MIYAGI 141°E FDNPS FUKUSHIMA IBARAKI Figure 2 Dose range (mSv) >5 (max. 5.3) 2-5 1-2 0.5-1 0.2-0.5 0.1-0.2 <0.1 Areas not assessed at municipality level Areas assessed separately 0 12.5 25 50 km Dose range (mSv) >5 2-5 1-2 0.5-1 0.2-0.5 0.1-0.2 <0.1 Areas not assessed at municipality level Areas assessed separately N 0 12.5 25 50 km uncertainties and variabilities. Typically, nine out of ten people in each population group were estimated to have received doses in the range of three times lower than the average dose to three times higher than the average. The estimated municipality- and prefecture-average absorbed doses to the thyroid for infants in the first year are in the range of about 2 to 30 mGy for municipalities that were evacuated, about 1 to 20mGy for other municipalities in Fukushima Prefecture, about 0.6 to 6 mGy in neighbouring prefectures, and about 0.09 to 0.7 mGy for prefectures in the rest of Japan. Decontamination work
View entire presentation