Investor Presentaiton

H PUYALLUP TRIBE V. DEPARTMENT OF GAME OF WASHINGTON (PUYALLUP I) (1968 - US SUPREME COURT) "But the manner in which the fishing may be done and its purpose, whether or not commercial, are not mentioned in the Treaty. We would have quite a different case if the Treaty had preserved the right to fish at the 'usual and accustomed places' in the ‘usual and accustomed' manner. But the Treaty is silent as to the mode or modes of fishing that are guaranteed." 391 U.S. 392, 398. I “[W]e see no reason why the right of the Indians may not also be regulated by an appropriate exercise of the police power of the State." 391 U.S. 392, 398.

View entire presentation