Investor Presentaiton slide image

Investor Presentaiton

96 INVESTOR-STATE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT: A SEQUEL lawyers who serve as arbitrators and counsel in IIA-based proceedings. An additional factor is that previous arbitral awards are referred to as persuasive authority in subsequent cases. Hence there could be an incentive to decide a case in a way that would be beneficial to an arbitrator's client in the second case. A separate facet of this problem stems from the fact that IIA disputes are governed by a relatively uniform legal field and that a few problematic IIA questions keep arising again and again. By researching the record of a particular arbitrator in earlier cases, one can predict in advance the position he or she is likely to take on a given issue. If arbitrators sit repeatedly in cases that address similar vexing issues, this gives rise to concerns that they have already taken a position on an issue (whether pro-State or pro-investor) and thus might not be in a position to be open-minded. Somewhat similarly, an individual's expressing an opinion on a particular issue in academic writings may be interpreted as evidence of "pre- judging" that issue. These matters are novel and in the process of development; so far, known attempts to challenge arbitrators on these grounds have been unsuccessful.90 G. Claims by investors on their own behalf and on behalf of an enterprise Most IIAS only authorize foreign investors to bring ISDS claims against host States. The investor, however, is only entitled to submit 90 A claimant's challenge alleging "pre-judgment" of an issue due to a position taken by the arbitrator in a prior case, as expressed in her separate opinion, was reportedly dismissed (EURAM v. Slovak Republic, UNCITRAL, decision not public). A challenge based on academic writings was unsuccessful to the extent the author (arbitrator) expressed only a view about a legal principle and not an opinion about its application to the case under review (Urbaser v. Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/26, Decision on Claimants' Proposal to Disqualify Professor Campbell McLachlan, Arbitrator, 12 August 2010). UNCTAD Series on International Investment Agreements II
View entire presentation