International Banking and Canadian Economy Overview

Canadian Bail-in Regulations: Jurisdictional Comparison Best in class approach Instrument type Opco senior Holdco senior Holdco senior¹ Holdco senior Ranking in Liquidation Pari passu with deposits and other senior liabilities Structural subordination2 Structural subordination2 Structural subordination2 Senior Deposits Other senior liabilities debt subject to Subordination schematic bail-in Capital Deposits Opco non- preferred senior Contractual subordination² Opco senior / senior preferred / other senior liabilities Holdco senior / senior non-preferred Capital Depositor preference No Yes Yes Yes Yes Participation in equity post resolution Conversion to equity of the bank or an affiliate allows participation in the upside, if any³ N/a4 Uncertain given possibility of write down Uncertain given Uncertain given possibility of write down possibility of write down Acceleration rights upon failure to pay Yes Yes Yes Yes No 5 principal and interest 1 Applicable in practice for G-SIBS' issuance of non-capital bail-in debt 2 Approach applicable to G-SIBS in relevant jurisdictions. Additionally, Switzerland uses structural subordination, Germany uses statutory subordination, Spain uses contractual subordination 3 Assuming only bail-in is triggered. If other resolution powers are exercised, debt holders could be exposed to losses in a manner similar to a write-down of their claims 4 No bail-in power. In resolution, debtholders could potentially receive partial recoveries (analogous to a write-down) or have their claims satisfied through the issuance of new securities (analogous to a bail-in conversion) 5 The terms of senior non-preferred do not include acceleration rights upon failure to pay principal and interest; however, there is no statutory restriction in this regard. Once resolution proceedings are underway, holders may declare an event of default for failure to meet payment obligations Scotiabank. 60

View entire presentation