Bank of America Investment Banking Pitch Book slide image

Bank of America Investment Banking Pitch Book

Introduction Overview of Key Considerations 4 Consideration Precedent Transactions Conflicts Committee Process Approach Dynamics Timeline Voting Dynamics Execution Method ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ I ■ The following discuss how best to execute a take private of SIRE Description While third-party M&A transactions typically require a control premium, affiliate take private transactions where a small minority exits the investment typically require lower premiums; since 2015 mean and median premiums of MLP take private transactions hav been 12.5% and 10.7%, respectively If SCR were to make an offer to the SIRE board to purchase the SIRE public units, SIRE's Board would form a Conflicts Committee to review the transaction on behalf of unaffiliated unitholders Conflicts Committee will hire independent financial and legal advisors Requires evaluation of the merits and considerations of a public versus private approach to SIRE Board If a private approach is made, SIRE's Conflicts Committee may still elect to disclose the offer publicly Absent a leak, a private negotiation with the conflicts committee should not cause a run-up on the "undisturbed" SIRE unit price and avoids the risk of a public deal failure if an agreement is not reached Of the 20 most recent MLP take privates about half have used a public approach However, SCR's partners will be required to update their 13Ds which will signal a potential transaction to the market even without a formal public announcement - Thus a private approach is not feasible in this situation Given the need to file amended 13D's, SIRE will likely decide to issue a press release upon receipt of the offer The overall process timeline can range from ~14 weeks to a number of months depending on the execution strategy and length of negotiations with the Conflicts Committee Per the SIRE partnership agreement, a take private can be consummated by a Unit Majority (i.e., a majority of the common units outstanding); SCR currently controls a majority of the units The Conflicts Committee may try to negotiate for a "majority of the minority" vote, which would require the approval of a majority of common units by written consent held by unitholders unaffiliated with SCR - This has not occurred in any of the last 19 transactions Requires evaluation of the merits and considerations of negotiating a merger or executing a tender offer Even with a tender offer, legal advisors will likely suggest seeking Conflicts Committee approval
View entire presentation