Insurgency Success Factors and Rebel Legitimacy slide image

Insurgency Success Factors and Rebel Legitimacy

This analysis also addresses gaps in legitimacy literature concerning external actor involvement in conflicts. External actors and external support are increasingly identified as significant influencers of rebel success 40. DeRouen and Sobek (2004) completed a study to evaluate the determinants of success in rebel groups. Their analysis suggests that external support is the greatest determinant of conflict outcomes, with greater levels of support contributing to greater levels of success 41. However, external actors have not yet been incorporated into discussions on legitimacy in rebellion. By evaluating legitimacy awarded by external actors, this analysis connects debates on external support to legitimacy literature. This analysis also contributes to contemporary legitimacy literature by applying legitimacy concepts to the rebellion in Chechnya. Russia consistently ranks lowest on the state legitimacy index and in legitimacy evaluations 42. Local rejection of Russian legitimate rule and repeat rebellions suggest that legitimacy literature could introduce beneficial interpretations of conflict in Chechnya. This assessment introduces the application of legitimacy theory to the context of Chechnya, to highlight its relevance to regional context. Successful Rebellions The base definition of rebel success is the deposition of the state government structure and assumption of power by a rebel group or the achievement of de facto rule over a designated territory 43. The contemporary reality of insurgencies and the growing presence of global and transnational factors complicate traditional definitions of insurgent success. In Syria, for example, multiple insurgencies with different objectives are occurring simultaneously44. The protracted nature of insurgencies can also mean that achievement of success in a given time period, does not equate to overall success of the insurgency or state. The Chechen insurgency's achievement of de facto status in 1996 and loss of that status in 1999 is a great example of 11
View entire presentation