Meta Shareholder Engagement Presentation Deck
Shareholder Proposals
META'S APPROACH TO EVALUATING SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
In considering whether a proposal is in the company's best interest and recommending how shareholders vote, our board of directors takes into account the following:
Proposal Three: Shareholder Proposal Regarding Government Takedown Requests
Submitted by the National Legal and Policy Center
●
✓engagement with the proponents
✓the company's current practices
✓ peer and market practices
✓shareholders' expressed preferences
●
Meta
Our board of directors recommends a vote AGAINST the shareholder proposal for the following reasons:
We are committed to transparency through the publication of information on how we address government requests for user data, content violating local laws,
global internet disruptions, and intellectual property.
Our board of directors provides oversight of the risks associated with our content management and monitoring practices.
A separate Oversight Board independently reviews a selection of Meta's content decisions to help interpret our policies and respect free expression.
We remain committed to transparency, including about content reported by a government agency that was removed for violating our Community Standards.
Given our ongoing efforts to address this topic, the board of directors does not believe that the requested report would provide additional benefit to our
shareholders.
●
✓ prior shareholder support for related topics
discussions with senior management
review by internal subject matter experts
the cost, feasibility and risks associated with implementation of the request
4View entire presentation