Uber Results Presentation Deck
Clarifying EDI misconceptions → Illustrative Example
Excess Driver Incentives is a negative revenue re-class and does not represent the incentive levels in a market
Eater Pays $34
(Includes $4 in delivery/service fees*)
Restaurant Remittance
(Net of 30% marketplace fee)
Total Delivery Person
Remittance
GAAP Revenue
GAAP EDI Reclass
(Cost of Sales)
ANR
Uber
Q3 2020 Earnings
Restaurant
$30
-$21
$9
Delivery Person Uber Consolidated
$34
-$21
$4
-$5
$0
(Negative revenue → reclass to EDI)
-$1
Note: The above example represents how transactions are accounted for in an agent model arrangement.
*Delivery Fees includes all delivery related fees including Small Order Fees and Service Fees
-$5
$9
-$1
$8
GAAP treats the restaurant and
Delivery Person contracts separately
and splits the Eater payment into
two different revenue transactions.
Uber balances the economics
between both restaurant and eater
fees. However, because Eater fees
are less than the Delivery Person's
costs in this example, the negative
revenue from the Delivery Person
contract is booked as cost of sales.
We use ANR to measure Uber's
take net of all restaurant and
courier remittances.
37View entire presentation