Investor Presentaiton

9TH CIRCUIT CASES AFTER TULEE IN FAVOR OF NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES H I Makah Indian Tribe v. Schoettler, 192 F. 2d 224 (1951) Tulee's "Conservation Necessity Doctrine": State had not proved regulation was necessary for conservation Maison v. Confederated Tribes of Umatilla Indian Reservation, 314 F.2d 169 (1963) Reserved Rights Doctrine, Conservation Necessity Doctrine (Indispensable), Disapproved of by Puyallup I Holcomb v. Confederated Tribes of Umatilla Indian Reservation, 382 F.2d 1013 (1967) Conservation Necessity Doctrine (Indispensable), followed Maison, Rejected “equal footing" argument (like Winans)

View entire presentation