Investor Presentaiton

H UNITED STATES V. OREGON (1969 - US DISTRICT COURT - DISTRICT OF OREGON) I TRIBAL CONSENT NOT REQUIRED, BUT COOPERATIVE APPROACH ENCOURAGED "This does not mean that tribal consent is required for restrictions on the exercise of the treaty rights." 302 F. Supp. 899, 912. "But certainly agreements with the tribes or deference to tribal preference or regulation on specific aspects pertaining to the exercise of treaty fishing rights are means which the state may adopt in the exercise of its jurisdiction over such fishing rights. Both the state and the tribes should be encouraged to pursue such a cooperative approach." 302 F. Supp. 899, 912.

View entire presentation