Leading Bank in the Americas Presentation

Canadian Bail-in Regulations: Jurisdictional Comparison Best in class approach Instrument type Opco senior Holdco senior Holdco senior¹ Holdco senior Opco non- preferred senior Ranking in Liquidation Pari passu with deposits and other senior liabilities Structural subordination² Structural subordination² Structural subordination² Contractual subordination² Deposits Deposits Other senior liabilities Subordination schematic Senior debt subject to bail-in Opco senior/senior preferred / other senior liabilities Capital Holdco senior / senior non-preferred Capital Depositor preference No Yes Yes Yes Yes Participation in equity post resolution Conversion to equity of the bank or an affiliate allows participation in the upside, if any³ N/a4 Uncertain given possibility of writedown Uncertain given Uncertain given possibility of writedown possibility of writedown Acceleration rights upon failure to pay principal and interest 1Applicable in practice for G-SIBS' issuance of non-capital bail-in debt Yes Yes Yes Yes No5 2 Approach applicable to G-SIBS in relevant jurisdictions. Additionally, Switzerland uses structural subordination, Germany uses statutory subordination, Spain uses contractual subordination 3 Assuming only bail-in is triggered. If other resolution powers are exercised, debt holders could be exposed to losses in a manner similar to a write-down of their claims 4 No bail-in power. In resolution, debtholders could potentially receive partial recoveries (analogous to a write-down) or have their claims satisfied through the issuance of new securities (analogous to a bail-in conversion) 5 The terms of senior non-preferred do not include acceleration rights upon failure to pay principal and interest; however, there is no statutory restriction in this regard. Once resolution proceedings are underway, holders may declare an event of default for failure to meet payment obligations 80 60

View entire presentation