Investor Presentaiton slide image

Investor Presentaiton

HKAS 1.51(a) HKAS 1.49 HKFRS 7.31-35 & 40-42 (d) HKFRS 7.31 & 33 HKFRS 7.40-42 & B17-28 HKFRS 7.41 HKFRS 7.42 HK Listco Ltd Financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 Currency risk 266, 267 The group is exposed to currency risk primarily through sales and purchases which give rise to receivables, payables and cash balances that are denominated in a foreign currency, i.e. a currency other than the functional currency of the operations to which the transactions relate. The currencies giving rise to this risk are primarily Euros, United States dollars, Japanese Yen and Australian dollars. The group manages this risk as follows: 278 Paragraph 40 of HKFRS 7 requires a forward-looking sensitivity analysis to be disclosed for each type of market risk (which includes interest rate risk, currency risk and other price risk) to which an entity is exposed at the end of the reporting period, showing how profit or loss and equity would have been affected by changes in the relevant risk variable (for example, prevailing market interest rates, currency rates, equity prices or commodity prices) that were "reasonably possible" at that date. In addition, the entity is required to disclose the methods and assumptions used in preparing the sensitivity analysis and any changes from the previous period in these methods and assumptions used, and the reasons for such changes. This requirement applies unless an entity prepares a sensitivity analysis, such as value-at-risk, that reflects interdependencies between risk variables and uses it to manage financial risk. If this is the case then the entity may choose instead to disclose that analysis instead of the sensitivity analysis described in paragraph 40 of HKFRS 7. HKFRS 7 does not prescribe a format in which a sensitivity analysis should be presented, although paragraph B17 of HKFRS 7 notes that exposures to risks from significantly different economic environments should not be combined. Further guidance in this respect can be found in paragraph B17 of HKFRS 7 and paragraph IG36 of HKFRS 7 contains an illustrative example of a narrative approach to the requirement. Entities should consider their individual circumstances in determining how they should prepare and present the information and care should be taken to ensure that clear descriptions of the methods and assumptions used to arrive at the amounts disclosed are provided. In addition, the following points should be noted when preparing the sensitivity analysis: • • Paragraph B19(b) of HKFRS 7 limits the assessment of what a future "reasonably possible change" in the relevant risk variable might be, to be an assessment of what changes are thought to be reasonably possible in the period until the entity next presents these disclosures. Paragraph B19(b) of HKFRS 7 notes that this is usually the next annual reporting period. According to paragraph B19(a) of HKFRS 7, a "reasonably possible change" should not include "worst case" scenarios or "stress tests". Instead, the economic environments in which the entity operates should be considered to identify an appropriate measure. In this respect it should be noted that paragraph B18 of HKFRS 7 indicates that the disclosure would consider changes at the limits of a reasonably possible range (i.e. rather than an arbitrary amount, for example, "1 percentage point change" in all variables). This particularly needs to be remembered where the impact of a greater or smaller change than the change used in the sensitivity analysis would not be directly proportional, for example where an entity has entered into interest rate caps or collars. When computing how profit or loss and equity would have been affected by changes in the relevant risk variable, it should be assumed that the "reasonably possible change" in the risk variable had occurred at the end of the reporting period and had been applied to the risk exposures in existence at that date. Further guidance on this is given in paragraphs B18 and IG34 to IG36 of HKFRS 7. In particular, entities are not required to determine what profit or loss for the past period would have been if relevant risk variables had been different. Instead, sensitivity analyses should be prepared based on financial instruments that are recognised at the end of the reporting period even where those exposures did not exist for the entire period, or where the exposures are expected to change significantly during the next period. Some financial instruments, although subject to market risk, are not re-measured in the financial statements in response to changes in market risk variables and therefore these changes in market risk variables would not affect profit or loss or equity in such cases. An example is a fixed rate debt instrument denominated in an entity's functional currency and measured at amortised cost. Such instruments would therefore be excluded from the sensitivity analysis calculation. If an entity considers that the sensitivity analyses required to be disclosed by HKFRS 7 are unrepresentative of a risk inherent in a financial instrument (for example because the year-end exposure does not reflect the exposure during the year), the entity should disclose that fact and the reason it believes the analyses are unrepresentative. Further guidance in this respect can be found in paragraphs IG37 to IG40 of HKFRS 7. 179 © 2023 KPMG, a Hong Kong partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited ("KPMG International"), a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
View entire presentation