Investor Presentaiton
RAIDEN
RESOURCES
JORC Code, 2012 Edition. Table 1
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections)
Criteria
Sampling techniques
•
JORC Code explanation
•
•
Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard
measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld
XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any
measurement tools or systems used.
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report.
In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg 'reverse circulation
drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In
other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling
problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed
information.
Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg
core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is
oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
Drilling techniques
•
Drill sample recovery
•
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.
Logging
.
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.
Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support
appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography.
Commentary
•
•
Rock chip sampling taken opportunistically from pegmatite outcrop
during a dedicated mapping and sampling program.
Pegmatite was identified in outcrop.
The rock chip samples were restricted to outcrop of potential pegmatitic
rocks.
Samples were dispatched to ALS Global Laboratories in Perth for
analysis.
In relation to this announcement no drilling has been conducted as yet and
no drill assays are being reported
In relation to this announcement no drilling sampling has been conducted
as yet and no drill assays are being reported
In relation to this announcement no drilling has been conducted as yet.
•
Rock chip samples were dispatched to ALS Global Laboratories in Perth
for analysis using their ME_ICP89 & ME_MS91 techniques.
•
The laboratory reported the use of standards and blanks as part of the
analyses for QA/QC.
"
•
The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.
Sub-sampling techniques and
sample preparation
"
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.
•
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.
For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.
•
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ material collected, including for instance
results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.
•
•
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.
Quality of assay data and
laboratory tests
•
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is
considered partial or total.
•
Verification of sampling and
assaying
•
The samples were opportunistic in nature and taken from in-situ outcrop.
Samples were approximately 1.6kg to 3.4kg in weight.
The samples were considered generally representative of the outcrop
being sampled
Rock chip samples were dispatched to ALS Global Laboratories in Perth
for analysis using their ME_ICP89 & ME_MS91 techniques.
The laboratory reported the use of standards and blanks as part of the
analyses for QA/QC.
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the
analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and
whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.
The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.
The use of twinned holes.
Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic)
protocols.
•
•
No standards or blanks were submitted by the company
All significant assay results have been verified against the results
reported by ALS Global Perth by two experienced company personnel.
All primary data has been uploaded into the company's data storage with
standard data entry protocols checked and verified by two experienced
RAIDEN RESOURCES INVESTOR PRESENTATION
23View entire presentation