Competitive Framework for Alaska: 2012 slide image

Competitive Framework for Alaska: 2012

Deficiencies Nonsensical cross subsidization of gas Table 5.1.3.1-1 Incremental Gas Economics for ACES in Alaska (Country Incremental, Real) Oil production (mln bbls) Gas production (Bcf) Oil price ($/bbl) North Slope Oil only 500 O 100 Oil + Gas Incremental 500 10000 100 10000 100 Gas Price ($/MMBtu) North Slope Gross Revenues ($ mln) 50000 Total Production (MIN BOE) 500 Capital Expenditures ($ mln) 7500 1.0 60000 2167 11000 1.0 10000 1667 3500 Operating Expenditures ($ mln) 5000 7500 2500 Divisible Income ($ mln) 37500 41500 4000 Royalties ($ mln) 6250 7500 1250 Property Tax, other 852 1504 652 Production Tax Value 30398 32496 2098 Production Tax Value per BOE 60.80 15.00 -46 PPT ($ mln) Corp Income Tax (State) ($ mln) Total State Revenues ($ mln) 15186 6900 -8286 1466 23754 2474 1008 18378 -5376 Corporate Income Tax (Fed) ($ mln) Total Government Revenues ($ mln) 4942 28696 8340 26719 3398 -1977 Undiscounted Government Take IRR 76.50% 21.10% 64.40% 19.30% -49.3% 17.3% The BOE concept would result in massive government revenue losses on oil production if incrementally also gas would be developed. This does not make any sense. It is clear that Alaska would not accept such unnecessary losses. This in turn impedes gas project development. 64 .4
View entire presentation