Investor Presentaiton slide image

Investor Presentaiton

AM 2.0 technologies scale with Moore's Law for cost-effective mass production Binder Jetting: Inkjet Technology Moore's law (1) Printhead drops per second (2) Inkjet performance (printhead drops per Illustrative breakeven analysis vs. tool-based manufacturing 1E+10 1E+09 1E+08 second) has roughly doubled every 18-24 months for the past 20 years 1E+07 1E+06 1E+05 1E+04 1E+03 1980 MEMS Single. Pass. Casting or Injection Molding Additive 1.0 technologies are typically throughput- limited, breaking even on cost with conventional manufacturing in 100's to 1,000's of units Machining DLP Module Power (Watts) = Polymerization Speed(3) UV Lamp Projection 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 5W 1990 2000 2010 2020 DLP Resolution = Build size(4) UV Diode Projection Array(5) 63W 5 13 11 31W 8K 21W 11W 8W 4K Cost per part Additive 1.0 (FDM, PBF) Desktop Metal today (SPJ, CDLM, Projection Arrays) Desktop Metal future Based on part size and geometric complexity O 1K -10 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 1 10 100 1K 10K 100K 1M 10M Quantity of parts 1. 2. 3. Source: Wijshoff, Herman, (2008), Structure and fluid-dynamics in piezo inkjet printheads, Integrated Assessment; management estimates. Printhead drops per second calculated as number of nozzles multiplied by maximum drop frequency. Increases in light source optical power correlate to increases in polymerization speed. Desktop Metal. 4. Increases in number of projection pixels enable larger build sizes without sacrificing resolution. 5. Projection arrays allow for native resolution and power as large as needed. Page 13 2022 Desktop Metal, Inc.
View entire presentation