Investor Presentaiton slide image

Investor Presentaiton

APPENDIX שיי Economic highlights of rare cannabinoid production RARE CANNABINOID OUTPUT IN HOUSE FERMENTATION VS. CULTIVATION Based upon our target yields, production of cannabinoids from fermentation delivers significant production cost savings Production of THC represents more than 23% cost savings When using the more potent THC-P, production savings exceeds 97% When applied to 2021 output forecasts, the cost savings for THC would be $12.8M1 There is a significant speed advantage to get production up and running when compared to cultivation construction In a world where each market requires a separate supply chain, this is critical to accelerate revenue On top of speed, fermentation provides a significant cost savings over agriculture To match cannabinoid output of a 145K square foot facility, a fermentation setup would require $1.3M of equipment and 4 FTEs in 4,000 square feet When applied to 2021 output forecasts, the cost savings for THC-P would be >$52M1 Estimated Cost savings for Parallel existing Infrastructure for infused products: $45M+1 With savings applied to 14x entry EBITDA multiple, implied enterprise value boost exceeds $729M² MICROBIAL PRODUCTION (COST PER GRAM) $19.60 $15.09 $0.46 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES PER GRAM $12.03 $0.47 Fermentation Agriculture Fermentation (THC) Fermentation (THC-P) Traditional Cultivation 1. See "Forward-Looking Statements" disclaimer on pages 3-4 and financial assumptions on pages 57-58. 2. See "Non-GAAP Measures, Reconciliation, and Discussion" disclaimer on page 5. (BioReactor) 62 52
View entire presentation