PV Modules: Bifacial technology slide image

PV Modules: Bifacial technology

Current status go PV Cooling: Tracker Topology VV (h) √√ch) Fast/cool Medium Slow/hot Fast/cool 16 ft 33 ft Medium Slow/hot イ イ Average GCR 40% Pitch AT AEnergy Temp. 1P Tracker 2P Tracker 5 m 10 m 33.96°C 3.52°C 1.3% 30.44°C 30.3°C 34.3°C 36.3°C Temperature 30 Height 1-in-P 2-in-P Average Module Temperatures in Uc Function 25 15 Uc W/m'k Higher module and pitch promotes better cooling. Cooling reduces module temperature and increases energy yield. The information contained in this presentation may be subject to confidentiality BITEC Field Data 1P vs 2P - 1P Standard Measured 2P SF7 Tracker Bifacial Gain Bifacial 16.8% Fall 2018 19.2% 12,6% Winter 2019 14,3% 10,4% Spring 2019 1.35m 12.1% 13,7% Summer 2019 15,8% Yield + 2.1% 16,6% Fall 2019 19,5% 16,8% Winter 2020 13.6% 15.7% 12.5% Spring 2020 18,7% 14,5% GCR 0.4 Albedo = 55.6% 2.35m Test Considerations: 8 Soltec Results based on energy performance at module level Only internal Trackers considered (avoid effect of higher diffuse on external Trackers) Only central modules considered (avoid effect of higher diffuse on edge modules) Results expected to be the average for large utility scale plants ⚫ Geotextile AEM With bigger spaces between Trackers easies the access for cleaning and trimming the grass. Higher Trackers allow bigger machinery to reach the whole surface underneath Effective height useful for bifacial reflection depends on the gras level, so relative height does. Down 2.2m 2.35m Down 0,5m 1P trackers 2P Soltec trackers influence of useful tracker height in relation to vegetation growth 1P vs. 2P. Source: Solter 4.1m Up Relative height (p.u.) 0.80 0.60 0,50 0,40 0.30 0 20 Grass height (cm) 1P-50cm 10-30cm 2P-50cm 60 The information contained in this presentation may be subject to confidentiality obligatione arising frum Softec's contractual relationships with third parties NX Horizon (1P) vs NX Gemini (2P): Beyond BF Gain 9 Soltec Bifacial Gain is not the only Metric. System-level design affects total energy yield For a constrained site with irregular boundaries: nextracker COMPON NX Horizon 37% GCR Bifacial PV Tracking: The Simulation and Optimization of Yield Gain. Soltec webinar. Apr 2018 Optimizing Plant Performance with Smart Solar Trackers & Bifacial Technology. Melissa Cooke, Nextracker. BiFi July 2020. NX Gemini 35% GCR +~0.5% yield 2020 NEXTRACKER Proprietory & Confidential 20 tecnalia Inspiring Business Early Findings: NX Horizon (1P) vs NX Gemini (2P) Near Identical Monofacial Performance, 1.3-2.4% Higher Bifacial Gain on NX Horizon (1P) NX Horizon (1P) 31% GCR 1.5m Axis Height NX Gemini (2P) 31% GCR 2.05m Axis Height High Albedo 1st half March 2020 Low Albedo 2nd half March 2020 11.4 96 519 Bifacial Whitepaper with modeled vs. measured analysis to be released Q3 2020 nextracker Company 9.0 % 3.8 % one Contidense bood GoPV Project | 1st TRAINING COURSES TECHNICAL FOCUS ON FUTURE SOLAR PV SYSTEMS October 26-29th 2020
View entire presentation