Nutrition Supplement Distribution Analysis

What have we learned? (i) 1. None of the foods prevented decline in LAZ over time. All foods performed comparably, but carry very different costs. 2. Most cost-effective re: defined outcome was CSB+. 3. Least cost-effective: CSWB (least often observed in-home; most shared; most often reported 'not lasting entire month'). 4. We can't ascribe performance to product composition. Relatively poor performance of children in the CSWB arm does NOT mean that adding WPC80 resulted in stunting. 85

View entire presentation