Tax Competitiveness of the Maquiladora Industry slide image

Tax Competitiveness of the Maquiladora Industry

10 index Tax Competitiveness of the Maquiladora Industry, a Study from the International Perspective From figures shown in table 1.5 we ascertain the fact that the competitive gap widens even more when segregating social security taxes, which are not subject to any type of incentives in the assessed regimes. This means that by comparing only the fiscal cost of such taxes that do receive preferential treatment, the result evidences a substantial drawback of the maquiladora regime versus the preferential regimes of comparable markets. Indeed it is worth emphasizing, for example, that in the case of Costa Rica and considering social security taxes, the TTI gap was only 6%; however, when segregating these taxes and analyzing only corporate taxes, the gap widens to 32%. Chart I.1 reveals that Mexico and Thailand have the highest and lowest effective corporate tax rates, respectively. Specifically in the case of social security taxes, Chart 1.2 shows that Mexico and South Korea have the highest effective social security taxes rate, respectively. The chart depicts the aforementioned findings. With respect to the total tax index, Chart 1.3 confirms the finding that puts Mexico as the least competitive country, followed by Costa Rica, Brazil, China and Thailand, while fiscally, South Korea turned out to be the most competitive. 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% Chart 1.4 shows the ranking of assessed countries considering only the analysis of corporate taxes and excluding social security taxes. This analysis confirms that Mexico is the least competitive country in terms of fiscal costs being that its effective rate is the highest, followed by China, Costa Rica, South Korea, Brazil and Thailand. Therefore, Thailand, one of the most dynamic South Asian sub-continent economies, proves to be more competitive than Mexico with 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Tax Competitiveness of the Maquiladora Industry, a Study from the International Perspective KPMG. 11 Chart 1.2 Effective Social Security Taxes Rate L Source: Prepared by KPMG in Mexico 2012. Mexico China Brazil Costa Rica South Thailand Korea 15% 10% 5% Chart I.1. Effective Corporate Tax Rates 0% Mexico China Brazil Costa Rica South Thailand Korea Source: Prepared by KPMG in Mexico 2012. the lowest Total Tax Index for corporate taxes. Reference should, however, be made to the fact that thanks to the results obtained from this analysis, we have substantiated that actually, the maquiladora regime is attractive and offers more competitiveness to Mexico. However, there are areas of opportunity where much can be done to improve the fiscal competitiveness of the regime in order to stimulate further foreign investment and, consequently, the creation of jobs. This analysis is based on research of cost data of the 2010-2011 period. Taxes reflect studies made for the same period (2010-2011) and consider the legislation of each of the current promoting regimes. For this reason, results are subject to changes due to amendments to existing legislation. Evidently, rates and costs will change over time. Chart 1.3 Total Tax Index 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Source: Prepared by KPMG in Mexico 2012. Mexico China Brazil Costa South Thailand Rica Korea 30 8852022 ° 100 90 Chart 1.4 Total Tax Index (TTI-SS) Source: Prepared by KPMG in Mexico 2012. Mexico China Brazil Costa Rica South Thailand Korea
View entire presentation