Investor Presentaiton
Idaho Supreme Court
Findings (Procedural issues)
Despite raising the issue for the first time on appeal, the Court did address the SMJ
argument, briefly. Found the court properly had SMJ.
Magistrate did not abuse discretion when denying Father's motion to continue. Opinion
notes that Father had been told several times that connectivity reliability was his
responsibility and that proceedings would not be delayed. Also notes that Father fails to
demonstrate how the trial court abused its discretion in denying the continuance.
Business records from Tennessee Department of Health and Welfare were properly
admitted based on the foundation laid by the State. Father had argued they were
hearsay and did not fall within the I.R.E. 803 (6) exception. The Court disagreed.
State's Motion for Service by Publication was proper. Father's argument was moot
because personal service was ultimately successful.View entire presentation