Investor Presentaiton

B Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results Drill hole Information Data aggregation methods Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: easting and northing of the drill hole collar elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar dip and azimuth of the hole down hole length and interception depth hole length. If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. • Not Applicable for the current ASX Release. These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of • Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true width not known'). Not Applicable for the current ASX Release. Interpretation of the regional geological structures, based on a number of sources and datasets (e.g. porphyry potential [Ford, et al, (2015) & USGS (2008)], crustal lineaments [Chernicoff, et. al, (2002)], regional gravity, regional magnetics, regional and local geology [SegemAR (2023) & Servicio Nacional de Geologia y Minera (2023)] had been utilised to confirm if the interpretation of alteration and/or mineralisation from the processed ASTER and Sentinel-2 datasets. Geological interpretation is then based on the responses displayed in the imagery against known surface hydrothermal alteration and/or surface geology associated with key mineral deposits. Geological analogues are a useful tool to delineate similar surface expressions of mineralisation. Follow-up on the ground exploration activities is required to confirm the remote sensing interpretation of the geology and in particular confirm the dimensions of any surface expression of alteration and/or mineralisation. 4 34

View entire presentation