Investor Presentaiton
•
Our coal is efficient when combusted
Relative to other coals, less Whitehaven coal is required to produce the same
amount of energy
The required feed rate for all
reference coals to deliver the
same power output is higher than
that of Whitehaven coal
Higher feed rates are required for
other coals because of their lower
calorific value as well as higher
moisture contents (in the case of
Indo sub-bituminous coals)
resulting in reduced boiler
efficiencies
The low impurities in Whitehaven
coal reduces parasitic loads on air
quality systems at power stations
Comparative coal feed rates (%) 1
163%
139%
125%
100%
104%
105%
105%
106%
108%
WHC
(Maules)
Australia (HV) Australia
Russia
Sth Africa
Colombia
(Surat)
Australia Indo (Sub Bit) Indo (LRC)
(Galilee)
7
1. Coal feed rates compare typical specifications from multiple origins with Whitehaven's Maules Creek thermal coal. Source: Commodity Insights.View entire presentation