Strong Growth Driven by Machine Placement
Ranpak
Foam
VS
Paper
EPS box
Medium protective
performance
Foam is too solid and stiff to
actually absorb shocke
Low speed operation
Slow operation speed due
to chemical process
Low cost efficiency
High initial investment and high
material costs
High protective
performance
Fast speed of
operation
Paper is natural flexible and
absorbs shocks
Fast speed allowing maximum
box throughput
Airbags
Low protective
performance
Airbags transmit shocks
to a product
Low speed of
operation
Slow operating speed and
additional storage required.
VS
Paper
VS
Paper
aterial wit
High cost efficiency
No initial investment required
and lower material costs
High level of box
handling
Boxes have to be moved from
truck to storage to packing
stations
High storage costs
The volume of stored EPS
boxes require huge amount of
warehouse space
Medium protective
performance
EPS takes care of a good
temperature protection, but
transfers shocks to the products
Paper production
on demand
Fast speed paper pad
production via variable modes
Low storage costs
One palet of paper is
comparable to 2.600 medium
sized EPS boxes
High protective
performance
Paper absorbs shocks and
is a good insulator
fust
Low cost efficiency
Additional costs for handling
and storage
High protective
performance
Paper provides good
shock absorption
High speed of
operation
Paper is produced on-demand
for a high operating speed.
High cost efficiency
Competitive costs-in-the-box
Bubble
on-demand
Medium protective
performance
Bubble can transmit shocks to
the products
VS
st
Paper
GROEIE
Low flexibility
Low cost efficiency
Limited packing techniques
possible
More material used,
difficult to dispose off
High protective
performance
Waved paper solucion
absorbs shocks
High versatility
A single effective solution to
diverse packaging challenges
High cost efficiency
A high-volume pad, cut to
precise length, using less
materialView entire presentation