#1Inter-Agency Task Force on UN Social and Solidarity Economy Why we need cooperatives to make the business world more people-centered. The Emilia-Romagna experience Vera Negri Zamagni University of Bologna and SAIS Europe of the Johns Hopkins University (Italy) Paper prepared in response to the UNTFSSE Call for Papers 2018 Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals: What Role for Social and Solidarity Economy?#2We live in a world where capitalist enterprises are producing too many negative externalities, among which: · . • • • scant attention to territories and local cultures (their plants can be easily displaced); moderate interest in people (only high ranking managers are well payed); destructive use of competition (they tend to abuse of dominant positions every time they can); scarce regard for democracy, both internal and external. but above all, an exclusive concentration on to their profits (maximization of shareholder value), which produces a tendency to minimize the legitimate interests of all other stakeholders including the states where they are active, to which they try to pay the lowest possible taxes. This paper offers an example of how another form of enterprise - the cooperative enterprise – can produce a better society, helping to achieve a number of the 17 SDG goals. -#3Of the 17 SDGs, cooperatives address mostly: • 1-2 (no poverty, no hunger), because they promote grass-root entrepreneurship by pooling modest amounts of capital into productive businesses; 8 (good jobs), being coops focused on defending employment; 10 (reduced inequalities), because coops redistribute profits across all their members and pay their managers less than capitalist enterprises; 11 (sustainable cities and communities), as coops tend to be formed also in small villages and peripheral districts. But the other SDGs as well are indirectly addressed by coops, being their mission that of catering for the needs of people.#4Concentrating here my argument on cooperatives, these are companies open to membership of not well to do people, as they normally require only a limited amount of share capital from their members, so they are inclusive businesses and help strengthening responsibility and civicness. Cooperatives are run democratically and tend to reward members and dependent. workers in a more equitable way, avoiding major gaps in remuneration between the high ranking employees and the unskilled ones. A substantial presence of cooperatives has a positive impact on the market at large, because they increase the number of firms operating with sound principles of fairness and correctness and competition is not interpreted as a race to the bottom.#5While cooperative enterprises can be created in almost any sector, in the following sectors they have shown a comparative advantage: - Users Cooperatives. This type of coop is created by people who use the products/services of their cooperative and can be found in retail trade, utilities, credit, insurance, housing, distribution of electricity and other public utilities. Members appoint managers to organize the business on their behalf, using dependent workers Users cooperatives. This type of coop is formed by members who produce in a private company of their own commodities which are conferred to a coop (or a consortium of coops) in charge of buying inputs, marketing and often processing the output. The best example is given by farmers coops, which increase the market power of farmers by contrasting monopsonies, and internalize the profits produced by the processing of the produce in dairy plants, wineries, oil mills, canneries etc. owned or controlled by coops.#6Workers cooperatives. These are self managed coops by those who work in them, advancing the capital which is needed. This type of coop has received a very large attention by the economic literature, starting with John Stuart Mill, because they are democratically run and contrast directly the capitalist form of enterprise. Workers coops are however today not so diffused in industry, but in services: transportation (taxis, lorries, buses), catering, facility management, logistics, management of cultural resorts and theatres, media, tourism, professional firms, social services. Social cooperatives (or community coops). It has taken a long time for this type of coop which delivers personal services to external clients to be officially recognized by ICA. Only in 1995 ICA added a 7th principle of external mutuality to the already existing 6 cooperative principles. They remain a special type of coop, combining workers and users of social services in a multistakeholder board and availing themselves also of part time voluntary workers. I will now proceed to highlight the Emilia-Romagna case.#7But before doing this, I need to remind that cooperatives have in Italy a quite substantial presence, in all sectors of the economy and enjoy a "constitutional" status, being mentioned specifically in article 45 of the Italian 1948 Constitution. One of the distinctive features of Italian coops is their wide presence in the whole economy, with a share of employment (Public Administration excluded) around 8% at the national level, but around 13% in Emilia Romagna (without taking into considerations the employment in joint stock companies controlled by cooperatives). Emilia-Romagna is one of the 20 Italian regions belonging to the North-East of the country. After a slow beginning, since the 1960s industrialization became widespread and it rapidly raised the level of wellbeing of the region to the highest in Italy (and in Europe). The model of the North-East, and particularly of the Emilia-Romagna, industrialization differs markedly from the North-West one and is based on SMEs, highly specialized in niche products (mostly metal-engineering, agro-food and beverages industry, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and artificial materials), where they are often among the world leaders. In the texture of Emilia Romagna's SMEs, cooperatives are excellently placed, as it can be seen in the following table.#8Emilia-Romagna cooperatives, 2008-2017 sd 2008 No. employment 2017 Turnover No. employment Turnover Million euros Million euros Agro-food and beverages 924 28172 7826 854 25669 8982 Manufacturing 321 10291 2524 264 9524 2397 Construction 602 10284 7378 521 4931 3844 Retail and wholesale trade 485 24700 11162 476 27037 13192 Logistics 712 27773 1852 717 27868 1891 Credit/insurance 158 5511 41 120 5160 747 Other services 2132 61777 Total 5334 168508 4098 2113 34880 5065 68152 4724 168341 35778 These positive results have been achieved through successful instruments.#9In the first place, much of the capital of Italian cooperatives is made up of "indivisible reserves", which are not depreciated by fluctuations in the stock exchange and can partly be used in situations of emergency to face temporary budget deficits. In the second place, while in normal times members and dependent workers of Italian cooperatives are paid according to national contracts negotiated by trade unions for each sector, in emergency situations the Italian legislation allows cooperatives more flexibility in the use of workers time and in their remuneration, with the aim of protecting jobs. A third instrument has been that of creating start ups in neighboring sectors, so as to give new jobs to surplus workers. Also, the coops umbrella organizations have used their solidarity funds to help restructuring cooperatives in crisis as part of the mutuality within coops, particularly in the building sector. It must also be mentioned that the wide presence of cooperatives in many sectors of the economy has allowed cooperatives to reap substantial “economies of networking”, enhanced by a tight umbrella organizations support.#10Some examples of substantial cooperatives active in Emilia Romagna can be clarifying. The largest is Alleanza 3.0, (3.7 billion euro of turnover in 2017), with 400 shops in 12 Italian regions, 2.3 million members, and is major part of the 94 Italian consumer coops, which together are in Italy market leader in organized retail distribution. Bologna hosts also the two connected companies Centrale Adriatica (which manages the warehouses of the Coop system, 3.2 billion euros of turnover) and Coop Italia (which manages the wholesale of the Coop system, 0.8 billion). In Bologna there are also the headquarters of CONAD (1.3 billion), the retailers coop created in 1963, which is today active through eight groups and has recently bought up the AUCHAN Italian branch. COOP, CONAD and some smaller cooperative groups cover 1/3 of the Italian organized retail distribution. Bologna is the home of largest coops in other sectors: CAMST (0.6 billion euros), the largest Italian coop in catering, created in 1946 (which is also the largest Italian company in catering tout court); Granarolo (1 billion), a large dairy joint stock company controlled by the coop Granlatte; Sacmi (0.9 billion), a substantial manufacturing coop producing machinery for tiles and for the confection of glass bottles; Re-keep (0.7 billion), a large facility management joint stock company controlled by the coop Manutencoop. It also hosts three important cooperative consortia: Conserve Italia (0.6 billion), a group of agro-food and beverages coops, CNS (0.8 billion), a group of facility management coops and Integra (0.7 billion), which organizes what remains of the construction coops.#11The insurance company Unipol (17 billion), created in 1963 by Emilia-Romagna coops as a joint stock company and still controlled by cooperatives, is a unique case, because it has become the second largest insurance company in Italy and is listed in the stock exchange. But Emilia Romagna is the home of other large cooperatives in wine, cheese, fruits, salami making, taxi and lorries driving, manufacturing, credit and social services. Social cooperatives are very creative, not only in inventing new assistance programs, but in creating jobs for disadvantaged people (handicapped, prisoners getting out of prison, formerly drugged people, migrants, abandoned and raped women, beggars) and in helping local authorities in the maintenance of greens. Also to be mentioned is the process of conversion of capitalist firms in difficulty into cooperatives: workers buy outs, helped by a law of 1985 and by an ad hoc agency created jointly by the three umbrella organizations, have allowed in the years 2008-2017 the rescuing of about 500 jobs. 10 out of the 20 largest companies in Bologna are cooperatives.#12Conclusions Cooperativism is in Italy strong as a result of a long lived historical tradition and of a post World War II legislation which supports coops, starting from article 45 of the Constitution. Among the causes of the particularly successful performance of Emilia-Romagna coops, the most important one is a culture of the work place as a place of collaboration and shared responsibility. This has led to a refusal by the people of the region to be recruited in anonymous big corporations, producing standardized goods and services. Not being able to reap economies of scale as a result of the limited size of companies, the Emilia- Romagna enterprises had to resort to other advantages: developing high quality products and services, becoming skilled in customizing products and in servicing clients, building tight networks of companies servicing each other, activating associations and common services at various levels. These are the very reasons why cooperatives are among the largest companies in the region: to work for a large cooperative is not the same as working for a large capitalist enterprise.#13It is also true that cooperatives in this region did not have to confront themselves with established big capitalist businesses and had a better chance of success than in places where capitalist enterprises were prime movers. The relatively comparable size between coops and capitalist enterprises in Emilia- Romagna has eased the collaboration among the two types of business, up to the point in which the national legislation allowing coops to control joint stock companies was put in place in 1984 as a result of lobbying from the region's coops. The Emilia-Romagna model of cooperative enterprises is a very peculiar one, because it avoids separation and marginalization of coops, allowing them to hybridize the capitalist context in which they are active by making it more social, but also to absorb the principles of efficiency from it, making coops capable to compete and even internationalize.